tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19727420.post651490193636756865..comments2024-03-23T12:05:13.464-07:00Comments on Ideas: All the News that Fits We PrintDavid Friedmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06543763515095867595noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19727420.post-23395994583934709542021-11-27T10:13:21.280-08:002021-11-27T10:13:21.280-08:00I don't follow the argument Anonymous is makin...I don't follow the argument Anonymous is making. <br /><br />Do you believe the material the Post shows wasn't really on the killer's social media?<br /><br />If it was, do you think it isn't newsworthy?<br /><br />If the NYT is deliberately not covering newsworthy material when it makes the left look bad, do you think that's a problem? If the NYT plus all media that don't have an ideological incentive to cover the material is doing it? Wouldn't that lead to large parts of the population having a distorted view of the world, where they see facts that favor one side of any left/right controversy, are shielded from facts that favor the other side?David Friedmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06543763515095867595noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19727420.post-66192618431913415762021-11-27T04:29:00.367-08:002021-11-27T04:29:00.367-08:00Using an absence of evidence as evidence is.... in...Using an absence of evidence as evidence is.... interesting. To be clear, I don't have an answer on this question.<br /><br />But using a lack of a gotcha would also lead you to conclude Trump did not collaborate with Russia while trying to get elected, too. You seem to invite deception from the very "liberal media" you seem to be critical of so much, when they want to flatter your sensibilities.<br /><br />Really typical of cynical use of the 'media bad' shit. You just deceive yourself.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com